Certain views/cards scale with text when added, but moving them scales them to default size

a24vinla commented

2026-04-16 12:54:02 +00:00

Collaborator

This is the card when added:

When clicked once in edit mode

The card showing way to much information is also a bug, but this is related to how the cards scale

This is the card when added: ![image](/attachments/42c91d4e-d61a-4f34-84c5-bbbe80b17c68) When clicked once in edit mode ![image](/attachments/ae18d080-0a66-4d6a-b7cb-36d54cf59899) The card showing way to much information is also a bug, but this is related to how the cards scale

image.png

66 KiB

image.png

65 KiB

a24vinla added the

bug

label

2026-04-16 12:54:02 +00:00

b23albst was assigned by a24vinla

2026-04-17 08:58:55 +00:00

b23albst commented

2026-04-17 10:37:06 +00:00

Collaborator

The reason for this bug is that there is no onLayoutChange function (to change the card position and size variables) for the grid layout, so the issue is that when a card is moved, its w and h variables are set to the values it was created with (1 and 2). When the card is moved, it is re-rendered with these values, hence why large cards shrink. The onLayoutChange is implemented in #398 to update the size and position.

This creates a new issue where new cards start with the standard variables. To fix this issue, new cards should scale with it's content. Therefore i suggest closing this issue and opening a new one.

The reason for this bug is that there is no onLayoutChange function (to change the card position and size variables) for the grid layout, so the issue is that when a card is moved, its w and h variables are set to the values it was created with (1 and 2). When the card is moved, it is re-rendered with these values, hence why large cards shrink. The onLayoutChange is implemented in #398 to update the size and position. This creates a new issue where new cards start with the standard variables. To fix this issue, new cards should scale with it's content. Therefore i suggest closing this issue and opening a new one.

b23albst added the

needs review

label

2026-04-17 11:58:35 +00:00

b23albst commented

2026-04-17 13:30:58 +00:00

Collaborator

The "new" issue might be fixed in pull request #410 , so there may not be any need for a new issue for this.