Improve design of textfields #626
Labels
No labels
_CRITICAL_
API
app
backEnd
Blocked, waiting for further changes
bug
cleanup
close
design
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
frontEnd
help wanted
invalid
low priority
needs input
needs review
project documentation
question
research
reviewed
script
security
SQL
style
testing
topLevel
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Andras/BoundlessFlowCampus2K#626
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
We need a better looking textbox! Please post screenshots in issue comments of different alterantives.
Alternative 1: Textfields with thicker border and rounded corners.
I think that this design makes the input fields more visible and improves clarity. The increased padding and border radius give a cleaner and more modern look.
Alternative 2: Filled textfields with soft background and colored focus state.
This design uses a light background instead of borders to create a softer appearance. The focus state is highlighted with a colored outline to make the active field more noticeable.
Alternative 3: Textfields with subtle shadow and soft focus outline.
This design uses a light shadow instead of a strong border to create a cleaner and more modern look. The focused field is highlighted with a soft outline, making it easy to identify while keeping the UI consistent with the rest of the system.
In my opinion, this is the best option as it fits well with the overall design and provides a good balance between clarity and simplicity.
What can we conclude when comparing other operating systems.
If no consensus can be found I really like https://m3.material.io/ as a basis for our design language
Yes, this is Alternative 2.
Thanks for pointing us to Material Design 3. It helped clarify the direction.
After comparing, this option aligns best with their text field guidelines. It uses a soft filled style, subtle borders, and a clear focus state without heavy shadows.
I think this is a good base to work from. We can keep this structure but adapt it by using our brand colors for the focus state and adjusting it to fit our overall theme.
This way we stay consistent with Material Design while still making it feel like part of our application.
This seems to be implemented I close this issue.