Andras/BoundlessFlowCampus2K

Fork 0

We need a new Settings icon #603

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-04-28 07:48:34 +00:00 by a24vinla · 13 comments

a24vinla commented

2026-04-28 07:48:34 +00:00

Collaborator

We want a new settings icon.

If possible, please design a few different versions so that we can have the customer choose.

We want a new settings icon. If possible, please design a few different versions so that we can have the customer choose.

a24vinla added the

design

label

2026-04-28 07:48:34 +00:00

b24johka commented

2026-04-28 08:19:08 +00:00

Collaborator

Worth noting in this issue is that we have a hamburger menu on the way, the initial plan was to have this instead of the cogwheel. I know we have discussed only having the hamburger menu on phone resolution, what do we think here? We could have icons in the hamburger menu as well ofc.

a24vinla commented

2026-04-28 08:35:17 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

I think it would be nice to add icons to the hamburger menu as well!

b25marem was assigned by c24elipe

2026-04-28 10:54:18 +00:00

b25marem commented

2026-04-28 13:28:05 +00:00

Collaborator

https://www.figma.com/design/ZD0uco7EBuHCKbAVHy72GD/new-settings-icon?node-id=0-1&p=f&t=ToiyGmMBeiIVaTet-0

a few different versions of a new settings icon.

![image](/attachments/bbd955fd-f80b-4a7e-a0d6-198787f076fe) https://www.figma.com/design/ZD0uco7EBuHCKbAVHy72GD/new-settings-icon?node-id=0-1&p=f&t=ToiyGmMBeiIVaTet-0 a few different versions of a new settings icon.

b25marem added the

needs review

label

2026-04-28 13:39:03 +00:00

b25marem commented

2026-04-28 16:54:06 +00:00

Collaborator

![image](/attachments/1dd06b80-4749-4717-8b47-67a7cb8d4873)

image.png

61 KiB

hGustavs commented

2026-04-29 12:29:12 +00:00

Owner

I assume any cog wheel that is in line with the general theme (line thickness / coloring etc) of the other icons is a good choice.

I like the last one but am unsure if it fits the theme.

I assume any cog wheel that is in line with the general theme (line thickness / coloring etc) of the other icons is a good choice. I like the last one but am unsure if it fits the theme.

hGustavs commented

2026-04-29 12:29:41 +00:00

Owner

I assume any cog wheel that is in line with the general theme (line thickness / coloring etc) of the other icons is a good choice.

I like the last one but am unsure if it fits the theme.

I assume any cog wheel that is in line with the general theme (line thickness / coloring etc) of the other icons is a good choice. I like the last one but am unsure if it fits the theme.

👍 1

b25marem commented

2026-05-06 07:11:37 +00:00

Collaborator

Before closing this issue, we need a final decision from the team lead/customer on which settings icon version should be used.

Several good alternatives were provided, but one design should be selected before the issue is closed.

Before closing this issue, we need a final decision from the team lead/customer on which settings icon version should be used. Several good alternatives were provided, but one design should be selected before the issue is closed.

a22erigr referenced this issue

2026-05-06 07:20:38 +00:00

Questions for product owner and customer Week 5 #700

a22erigr commented

2026-05-07 11:59:05 +00:00

Collaborator

The customer suggest that we should use material designs icons. @b25marem can you find the official material designs icon.

b25marem commented

2026-05-07 12:24:19 +00:00

Collaborator

No description provided.

image.png

4.2 KiB

b25marem commented

2026-05-07 12:26:02 +00:00

Collaborator

No description provided.

image.png

1.4 KiB

b25marem commented

2026-05-07 12:35:21 +00:00

Collaborator

I checked the official Material Design icons and found a few good candidates such as:

settings
tune
settings_applications

We can test them in the toolbar and hamburger menu to see which one fits the UI best.

Just to clarify, do you mean that we should only test different official Material Design icons in the UI, or should we also create custom design/mockup variations for the customer to choose from, as mentioned in the issue description?

I checked the official Material Design icons and found a few good candidates such as: * settings * tune * settings_applications We can test them in the toolbar and hamburger menu to see which one fits the UI best. Just to clarify, do you mean that we should only test different official Material Design icons in the UI, or should we also create custom design/mockup variations for the customer to choose from, as mentioned in the issue description?

a22erigr commented

2026-05-08 14:41:32 +00:00

Collaborator

@b25marem wrote in #603 (comment):

I checked the official Material Design icons and found a few good candidates such as:
* settings

* tune

* settings_applications
We can test them in the toolbar and hamburger menu to see which one fits the UI best.

Just to clarify, do you mean that we should only test different official Material Design icons in the UI, or should we also create custom design/mockup variations for the customer to choose from, as mentioned in the issue description?

To get a uniform look we should only use the official meterial desicn icons if possible.

@b25marem wrote in https://git.webug.se/Andras/BoundlessFlowCampus2K/issues/603#issuecomment-8691: > I checked the official Material Design icons and found a few good candidates such as: > > * settings > > * tune > > * settings_applications > > > We can test them in the toolbar and hamburger menu to see which one fits the UI best. > > Just to clarify, do you mean that we should only test different official Material Design icons in the UI, or should we also create custom design/mockup variations for the customer to choose from, as mentioned in the issue description? To get a uniform look we should only use the official meterial desicn icons if possible.

👍 1

b25marem added the

label

2026-05-08 15:47:39 +00:00

a22erigr commented

2026-05-12 09:26:26 +00:00

Collaborator

We are going to be using material design

a22erigr closed this issue

2026-05-12 09:26:27 +00:00