Andras/BoundlessFlowCampus2K
4
7
Fork 0
Code Issues 90 Pull requests 7 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

We need a server running through docker #305

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-04-15 10:27:59 +00:00 by a24vinla · 5 comments
a24vinla commented 2026-04-15 10:27:59 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

We need a server to store images users upload. This should run through docker. Check related issue #202 for information.

We need a server to store images users upload. This should run through docker. Check related issue #202 for information.
a24noabe commented 2026-04-16 13:32:31 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

I've checked #172 where they compared Amazon S3 and Cloudflare R2. They're both well known cloud-based storage solutions, but the issue is the fact that they are cloud-based storage solutions. I don't think we want to use cloud storage since it makes us dependent on the services of other actors. Even though they both are cheap for the amount of storage used, not paying a single öre would be preferable. We should also consider the fact that they are proprietary/closed-source, a well maintained open-source solution would be preferable. I will return with some comparisons between services and storage solutions we could use.

I've checked #172 where they compared Amazon S3 and Cloudflare R2. They're both well known cloud-based storage solutions, but the issue is the fact that they are cloud-based storage solutions. I don't think we want to use cloud storage since it makes us dependent on the services of other actors. Even though they both are cheap for the amount of storage used, not paying a single öre would be preferable. We should also consider the fact that they are proprietary/closed-source, a well maintained open-source solution would be preferable. I will return with some comparisons between services and storage solutions we could use.
a24noabe commented 2026-04-20 09:46:24 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

The comparison I've made is a bit stupid, since it's a comparison between an actual solution and two protocols. I've also come to the conclusion that we shouldn't use any type of object storage, it's a bit out of the scope of this project and would be unnecessarily complex. We should build our own service using either SFTP or HTTPS. HTTPS would work well since dotnet has support for listening to the protocol, and for writing to the file system.

The comparison I've made is a bit stupid, since it's a comparison between an actual solution and two protocols. I've also come to the conclusion that we shouldn't use any type of object storage, it's a bit out of the scope of this project and would be unnecessarily complex. We should build our own service using either SFTP or HTTPS. HTTPS would work well since dotnet has support for listening to the protocol, and for writing to the file system.
Data storage.pdf
50 KiB
a24timsv commented 2026-04-22 12:55:40 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Henrik wanted the project to use a GET solution as it would provides the most secure, user-specific solution. HTTPS it is.

Henrik wanted the project to use a GET solution as it would provides the most secure, user-specific solution. HTTPS it is.
a24sakma commented 2026-05-07 19:18:24 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

@a24vinla what is the status of this issue?

@a24vinla what is the status of this issue?
c24danli commented 2026-05-21 12:43:39 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Closed in PR: #947 , a new issue is working on further changes

Closed in PR: #947 , a new issue is working on further changes
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
#1236-edit-mode-txt
#1229-generic-themed-buttons
Add-an-option-to-set-no-image-to-image-view-1227
#1242-prog-bar-colors-fix
#1239-Remove-Vertical-Scroll
Image-view-error-1230
Make-the-card-title-and-header-of-card-uniform-1233
both_teams_week_8
team_2_week_7
team_1_week_7
temp_branch_week_7
team_2_week_6
team_1_week_6
team_2_week_5
team_1_week_5
temp_branch_week_5
team_2_week_4
team_1_week_4
week_4_temp_branch
temp-branch-week-3
team_2_week_3
team_1_week_3
team_2_week_2
team_1_week_2
temp-week-2-merge-branch
team_2_week_1
team_1_week_1
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
_CRITICAL_

Only use this label for critical tasks that are project-scope,and must be addressed ASAP.

  
API

   
app

   
backEnd

   
Blocked, waiting for further changes

   
bug

Something is not working

  
cleanup

Issues to cleanup the codebase (restructure folders, remove deprecated or smelly code)

  
close

Issue to close

  
design

   
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
feature request

   
frontEnd

   
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
low priority

   
needs input

Issue needs input from product owner or customer

  
needs review

issue is in need of review

  
project documentation

   
question

More information is needed

  
research

   
reviewed

This Issue has been reviewed

  
script

   
security

use this for security-related issues

  
SQL

  
style

   
testing

   
topLevel

Reserved for top-level, project-wide issues.

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
_CRITICAL_
API
app
backEnd
Blocked, waiting for further changes
bug
cleanup
close
design
duplicate
enhancement
feature request
frontEnd
help wanted
invalid
low priority
needs input
needs review
project documentation
question
research
reviewed
script
security
SQL
style
testing
topLevel
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
a24noabe
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Andras/BoundlessFlowCampus2K#305
No description provided.